No upfront cost Free, private case review Independent and attorney vetted
Woman in suit interviews man across table

Questions to ask a catastrophic injury lawyer

A catastrophic injury case can run for years, require the firm to fund expert work long before any money comes back, and end in a number that has to last a lifetime. The consultation is the one moment where you are the one deciding. This guide sets out what to ask, what the fee agreement is already required to tell you in writing, and how to tell a real answer from a rehearsed one.

Jump to a section
Already required
In writing
Under the Model Rules a contingent fee agreement must be written and signed by the client.
The detail people miss
Before or after
Whether costs come off before or after the fee is calculated changes what actually reaches you.
Rates can differ
By stage
The agreement must state the percentage for settlement, for trial, and for appeal separately.
If you lose
Ask anyway
The agreement must say which expenses you owe whether or not you win.

Key takeaways

  • Some answers are already owed to you in writing. You do not have to negotiate for them. The professional conduct rules require the fee agreement to contain them.
  • The most consequential question is the least asked. Whether case costs are deducted before or after the percentage is calculated can move your net by a large amount.
  • Capacity is a fair question and a polite one. A firm that cannot fund years of expert work will feel pressure to settle early, and that pressure lands on you.
  • How they answer matters as much as what they answer. Specific, qualified, occasionally uncomfortable answers are a better sign than smooth ones.
Editorial content, not legal advice

This guide is written and reviewed by our editorial team to be accurate and current. It is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. The professional conduct rules quoted here are the American Bar Association's model rules, which bind nobody until a state adopts them, and states adopt them with variations. Check your own state's rule before relying on any of it. If you are facing an emergency, call 911.

01 Why this conversation is different

Quick answer

Most questions to ask a personal injury lawyer lists are written for ordinary claims that resolve in months. A catastrophic case is a different undertaking: it runs for years, the firm advances very large sums against an uncertain outcome, and the settlement has to fund care for the rest of a life. The questions that matter change accordingly.

If you have not yet worked out what the case itself involves, our guide to vetting a catastrophic injury attorney covers the background research to do before you ever sit down with anyone.

The money is different. The experts a serious case needs are costly enough that who funds them, and for how long, becomes a question about the firm rather than about you.

The timescale is different. You will be working with these people for longer than most jobs last.

The stakes do not reset. An ordinary claim settled badly is a disappointment. A lifetime care claim settled badly is a shortfall you live inside.

Bottom line: treat the consultation as an interview you are conducting, not an application you are submitting.

02 What the fee agreement must already tell you

Quick answer

Several of the most important answers are not favours you have to ask for. Under the American Bar Association's model conduct rules, a contingent fee agreement has to be in writing, signed by you, and has to spell out the percentages, the expenses, and one detail that changes your net substantially: whether costs come off before or after the fee is worked out.

Knowing this changes the tone of the conversation. You are not asking a firm to be generous. You are asking it to hand over what the rule says should already be written down.

What the model rule requires
Writing, signature, percentages, expenses, and the order of operations
American Bar Association, Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5(c)

The rule provides that a contingent fee agreement shall be in a writing signed by the client and shall state the method by which the fee is to be determined, including the percentage or percentages that shall accrue to the lawyer in the event of settlement, trial or appeal; litigation and other expenses to be deducted from the recovery; and whether such expenses are to be deducted before or after the contingent fee is calculated. It adds that the agreement must clearly notify the client of any expenses for which the client will be liable whether or not the client is the prevailing party. At the end of the case, the rule also requires a written statement of the outcome showing the remittance to you and how it was worked out. Read Rule 1.5

Before or after is not a technicality

Take a recovery and subtract case costs from it. Then take the same recovery and apply the percentage first, subtracting costs from what is left. Those two sequences produce different amounts in your pocket, and the larger the case costs run, the wider that gap becomes. The rule requires the agreement to say which applies. Ask the question out loud anyway, and ask them to walk you through the arithmetic on a realistic figure before you sign. Our guide to fees and contingency arrangements goes through the mechanics in detail.

Woman in suit shows document to man
The agreement
Read it before you sign it.

03 Should you interview more than one firm?

Quick answer

For a catastrophic case, yes, if your health and the deadlines allow it. Consultations are free and you are not obliged to anyone until you sign. Two or three conversations will teach you more about what a good answer sounds like than any list of questions to ask a personal injury lawyer can.

There is one real constraint. Evidence perishes and filing deadlines run, so this is not a reason to spend a month deciding. A week of comparison is usually affordable; a season is not.

Worth seeing more than one if

  • The injury is permanent or life-changing.
  • The first firm would not give straight answers on fees.
  • You were approached rather than doing the approaching.
  • Nobody has explained what happens to costs if you lose.
  • You simply did not feel heard.

Move faster if

  • A filing or notice deadline is close.
  • Physical evidence is about to be repaired or destroyed.
  • You already have a firm you trust and their answers held up.
  • Your condition makes drawn-out meetings genuinely harmful.
Illustrative example

A family sees one firm, likes them, and signs at the first meeting. Eighteen months later they learn that costs are deducted after the fee is calculated rather than before, and that the percentage rises if the case is tried. Both facts were in the agreement they signed and neither was discussed out loud.

04 Questions about money

Quick answer

Five things decide what actually reaches you: the percentage, whether it changes by stage, which costs are charged to the case, whether costs come off before or after the fee, and what you owe if the case is lost. Ask all five and ask for the answers in writing.

None of these is an awkward question. A firm that finds them awkward has told you something.

  • What is the percentage, and does it change? The rule contemplates different rates for settlement, trial and appeal. Find out what triggers a rise and at what moment.
  • Before or after? Whether expenses are deducted from the recovery before or after the fee is calculated. Ask them to show you both on a realistic number.
  • What counts as a case cost? Experts and filing fees obviously. Ask specifically about in-house charges such as copying, postage, staff time and interest on advanced funds.
  • What do I owe if we lose? The rule requires the agreement to notify you of expenses you are liable for whether or not you prevail. Get the answer in plain words.
  • Who is paid before I am? Health insurers, Medicare or Medicaid, and medical providers may all have claims on the recovery ahead of you.

05 Questions about capacity

Quick answer

A catastrophic case is a financing exercise as much as a legal one. The firm has to pay experts, life care planners, economists and investigators for years before any money comes back. If it cannot comfortably carry that, the pressure to accept an early offer becomes structural rather than tactical.

You are allowed to ask about this directly, and a serious firm will not be offended.

  • How do you fund case costs? From firm capital, a line of credit, or third party litigation funding. Each has different consequences for how long they can hold out.
  • What is the largest case cost you have carried? A concrete answer tells you more than a general assurance.
  • How many cases like mine are open right now? Not how many they have ever handled. What is on the desk this month.
  • How many have you taken to verdict? Insurers know which firms try cases. A firm that never tries one negotiates from a weaker position and everyone in the room knows it.
  • What happens if this needs an appeal? Appeals take years more and cost more. Find out now whether they do that work or hand it on.
Man and woman talking inside office
Who is in the room
And who will be, in a year.

06 Questions about who does the work

Quick answer

The lawyer in front of you may not be the lawyer who runs your case. Some firms sign cases and refer them out entirely. Others hand the file to a junior or a case manager after signing. Neither is necessarily wrong, but you should know which is happening before you agree to it.

The referral question has its own rule attached, and it is worth knowing that the arrangement requires your agreement.

If your case is passed to another firm
You have to agree to the split, in writing
American Bar Association, Comment on Model Rule 1.5

The commentary notes that a division of fees between lawyers in different firms most often is used when the fee is contingent and the division is between a referring lawyer and a trial specialist, and that the client must agree to the arrangement, including the share that each lawyer is to receive, and the agreement must be confirmed in writing. So if a firm intends to refer your case on, you are entitled to know that, to know who is getting what, and to say yes or no. There is nothing improper about referral itself. A lawyer who knows a specialist will do better for you than they would is acting properly by saying so. Read the commentary

  • Will you be the lawyer on my case? Ask for the name of the person who will actually run it, and ask to meet them before signing.
  • Do you intend to refer this out? If so, to whom, on what split, and when will you be asked to confirm it in writing.
  • Who will I actually speak to? Day to day contact is often a paralegal or case manager. That is normal. Knowing it in advance prevents a year of frustration.
  • How quickly do you return calls? Ask for the firm's own standard, then ask what happens when they miss it.

07 Questions about the plan

Quick answer

Ask what they intend to do in the first ninety days, who they will hire to prove the injury and its lifetime cost, what insurance they have already identified, and how they will handle the claims that health insurers and public programs will make against your recovery.

A firm with a plan will answer these quickly because they have done it before. A firm without one will speak in generalities about fighting hard.

  • What happens in the first ninety days? Preservation letters, investigation, medical records, experts instructed. Ask for the sequence and the dates.
  • Who costs out a lifetime of care? Serious cases usually need a life care planner and an economist. Ask who they use and when those people get instructed.
  • What cover have you already found? And what else will they look for beyond the obvious policy.
  • How will you handle claims against the recovery? Health plans and public programs frequently want repaying. Handled late, this reduces what reaches you.
  • What could go wrong with this case? The most useful question on the page, and the one that separates candour from salesmanship.

08 How to run the meeting

Quick answer

Bring someone with you, bring your questions written down, ask for the fee agreement before you are asked to sign anything, take notes or ask to record, and go home before deciding. Nothing about a legitimate consultation requires you to commit in the room.

If you are recovering from a serious injury, the practical steps below matter as much as the questions themselves.

1

Bring a second person

Someone to take notes and remember what was said. If you are injured, medicated or exhausted, this is not optional. Two people hear a consultation better than one, and their impressions afterwards are worth having.

2

Write the questions down beforehand

Print or note the list in section 11. In the room it is easy to be carried along by a confident presentation and leave having asked nothing you meant to.

3

Ask for the fee agreement early

Not at the point of signing. Ask to see the actual document partway through so you can put questions about it while someone is still there to answer them.

4

Ask them to do the arithmetic in front of you

Pick a plausible recovery figure and ask them to work through fee, costs and repayments to the number you would receive. Watching someone do this tells you a great deal.

5

Take the agreement home

Any firm worth hiring will let you leave with the document unsigned. Read it somewhere quiet, against the notes you took, and against section 02 of this guide.

6

Check the license before you sign

Your state bar publishes attorney standing and discipline records. It takes a few minutes and it is the one fact you can verify entirely independently of anything you were told.

Woman in glasses interviews man at office desk
The answers
How they answer is data too.

09 Reading the answers you get

Quick answer

A specific answer is worth more than a smooth one, even when the specific answer is less comforting. A lawyer who names a number, admits a weakness, or says plainly that something depends on facts nobody has yet is giving you more than one who is reassuring throughout. Certainty early in a complicated case is the least trustworthy thing you can hear.

Most guides list the questions to ask an injury attorney and stop there. The harder skill is knowing what the answers are worth.

How to interpret different kinds of answer
What you hearWhat it usually means
A specific figure, with the assumptions attachedThey have done this before and are willing to be held to something
"That depends on what the records show"Usually honest. The follow-up question is what would change the answer
A named weakness in your caseA good sign. Every real case has one, and hearing it now is better than later
A confident valuation at the first meetingNobody can value a lifetime care case before the medicine is settled
Deflection on fees or costsThe one topic where the answers are already required to be written down

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

One more test. Ask a question you already know the answer to from this page, such as whether costs come off before or after the fee. You are not trying to catch anyone out. You are finding out whether this firm explains things clearly to someone who is not a lawyer, which is what you will need from them for the next several years.

10 How state rules change this

Quick answer

Everything quoted above comes from the American Bar Association's model rules. Those are a template. They bind no lawyer anywhere until a state supreme court adopts them, and states adopt them with changes. Some go further than the model; a few say something different.

This matters because the specific protections described in section 02 may be stronger, weaker or differently worded where you live.

  • Additional disclosure requirements. Some states require the lawyer to give you a copy of the signed agreement at the moment of signing, which the model rule does not say in those terms.
  • Caps and schedules. A number of states limit contingency percentages in certain kinds of case, sometimes on a sliding scale.
  • Fee division rules. States differ on what a referring lawyer may take and what they must do to earn it.
  • Where to check. Your state bar publishes its own rules of professional conduct, usually free and searchable. That is the version that governs your agreement, not the model.
We are not naming states

Contingency rules vary in ways that matter, and we could not find state-by-state authority we were willing to rely on. Rather than print a table that might be wrong about your state, we would rather tell you exactly where the authoritative version lives: your own state bar's rules of professional conduct, published by the bar itself. Search for your state's Rule 1.5 and read it. It is short, and it is the version that actually applies to the document you are being asked to sign.

A woman sitting at a table with a piece of paper in front of her
Take the list
Written down, into the room.

11 The full list in one place

Quick answer

Twenty questions, grouped the way the sections above group them. Print this, or write it out. You will not ask all of them, but having the list in front of you is what stops a confident presentation from carrying the hour.

This is a longer set of questions to ask a personal injury lawyer than most lists give you, because a permanent injury case has more moving parts than most claims. If you want the same ground organized as a scoring exercise rather than a conversation, our attorney vetting checklist covers it in a form you can tick off.

  1. What is your contingency percentage, and does it change at trial or on appeal?
  2. Are case costs deducted before or after the fee is calculated?
  3. Will you show me that arithmetic on a realistic recovery figure?
  4. What exactly counts as a case cost, including anything charged in-house?
  5. What do I owe if we lose?
  6. Who gets paid out of the recovery before I do?
  7. How do you fund case costs over several years?
  8. What is the largest case cost your firm has carried?
  9. How many cases like mine are open in your office right now?
  10. How many have you taken to verdict, and when was the last one?
  11. Who will actually be the lawyer on my case, and can I meet them?
  12. Do you intend to refer this case to another firm?
  13. If so, who, on what split, and when do I confirm that in writing?
  14. Who will I speak to day to day?
  15. What is your standard for returning calls?
  16. What will you do in the first ninety days?
  17. Who will cost out a lifetime of care, and when are they instructed?
  18. What insurance have you already identified, and what else will you look for?
  19. How will you deal with health plan and public program claims on the recovery?
  20. What are the genuine weaknesses in this case?

12 Red flags

Quick answer

Pressure to sign in the room, a valuation offered before the medicine is understood, vagueness about costs, an unwillingness to name who will run the file, and any approach that came to you unsolicited after an accident.

None of these proves misconduct. All of them are reasons to see somebody else before deciding.

Walk away, or at least walk out and think

Sign today or the offer changes. Nothing about a legitimate retainer expires this afternoon. A number promised at the first meeting. Lifetime care cannot be valued before the medical picture is stable. Cost questions deflected. This is the one area where the answers are already required to be in writing. No name for the lawyer running the file. Ask again; if there is still no name, that is the answer. They contacted you first. Unsolicited approaches to injured people are restricted in most states, and the restriction exists for a reason.

One last thing worth saying plainly. Feeling rushed, patronised or unheard in the first meeting is itself information. You are choosing somebody to work with through the hardest years of your life, and a firm that cannot make an hour feel respectful is unlikely to improve once the paperwork is signed.

How we vet every lawyer

We do not connect people with just anyone. Before we do, the attorney has to clear a checklist built for serious injury work. Every one of these has to be true.

  • Active, discipline-free license

    Verified good standing with the state bar, with no unresolved discipline on record.

  • Catastrophic injury experience

    A documented record in permanent injury work, including cases carried through expert discovery rather than settled early.

  • Capacity to fund a long case

    The resources to advance expert costs over years without the case being driven by cash flow.

  • Clear contingency terms

    Fees and case costs put in writing up front, so you know exactly how it works before signing.

Tell us what happened and we will only match you when a case genuinely fits.

When you are ready

Two ways forward when you have your questions ready. The companion guides on vetting an attorney and on how fees actually work are linked in sections 01 and 02 above.

Help in all 50 states

MVA Lawyer Network is a nationwide guide. Wherever you are, we can connect you with an independent attorney licensed in that state.

Northeast Southeast Midwest Southwest West Coast Mountain West Gulf States Alaska and Hawaii

Rules of professional conduct are adopted state by state, so the exact contingency requirements, any percentage caps, and the rules on dividing a fee with another firm all depend on where your lawyer is licensed. Your state bar publishes the governing version. The filing deadline for the claim itself, known as the statute of limitations, is a separate state question again and it may already be running.

Sources and authorities

This page rests on one primary source, quoted directly and linked, plus its official commentary.

Professional conduct rules

  • American Bar Association, Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5: Fees. Source of everything quoted in section 02: the writing and signature requirement, the percentages for settlement, trial and appeal, the treatment of expenses, the before or after question, liability for expenses whether or not you prevail, and the closing statement of account. ABA.
  • American Bar Association, Comment on Model Rule 1.5. Source of the material in section 06 on dividing a fee between lawyers in different firms, including that the client must agree to each lawyer's share and that the agreement must be confirmed in writing. ABA.

The most important caveat on this page. The Model Rules are a template published by a professional association. They are not law. They govern nobody until a state's highest court adopts them, and states adopt them with amendments. Section 10 says this and section 02 flags it, but it bears repeating here because the rest of the page would be misleading without it. The version that governs your fee agreement is your own state's rule, published by your state bar.

On the cost of running a case. This page says repeatedly that expert costs are large and take years to recover, and that a firm's ability to carry them matters. It deliberately puts no figure on it. We looked for a defensible published number for what catastrophic injury litigation costs to run and found none we would stand behind. If a firm gives you a range, that is useful information about that firm, but treat it as their estimate rather than an industry figure.

Why we name no states. Contingency caps, extra disclosure duties and fee division rules differ meaningfully between states, and a table getting one of them wrong would be worse than no table. We looked for authority we were willing to cite state by state and did not find it. Section 10 points you at the source that is authoritative for you instead.

On our own position. We are a referral service. Section 06 explains that referral arrangements require your agreement in writing, and that rule applies to arrangements involving us as much as to anything else. We think you should ask us the same questions this page tells you to ask a law firm.

Our editorial standards

How we keep this guide accurate and worth trusting.

01

Quoted, not paraphrased

The rule language in section 02 is reproduced from the published rule and linked, so you can check it.

02

Model rules labeled as models

We say repeatedly that these bind nobody until a state adopts them, because the page would mislead otherwise.

03

Editorial, not legal advice

This is general information to help you make decisions, not advice about a specific case in a specific state.

04

Honest about how we operate

We are an independent referral service, not a law firm, and we may be paid a referral fee by the attorney if you hire through us.

Michael Mangione, Legal Research Editor
Michael Mangione Verified editor
Legal Research Editor · Founder, The Mangione Group, Inc.

MVA Lawyer Network is edited by Michael Mangione, who has spent more than twelve years working inside contingency-based law firms, building intake departments, designing qualification frameworks, and studying how claims are screened and pursued from the first call through resolution. That work is the reason this page exists: he has watched a great many consultations from the firm's side of the desk. Michael is not a practicing attorney and does not give legal advice. The rule language here is quoted and linked so readers can check it.

Common questions, answered

General information, not legal advice. Professional conduct rules are adopted state by state, so check your own state bar's version before relying on anything here.

What are the most important questions to ask a personal injury lawyer?

For a serious case, the money questions come first because the answers are already required to be in writing: the percentage and whether it changes at trial or appeal, what counts as a case cost, whether costs are deducted before or after the fee is calculated, and what you owe if you lose. After that, ask who will actually run your file and what they will do in the first ninety days.

Does the fee agreement have to be in writing?

Under the American Bar Association's Model Rule 1.5(c), a contingent fee agreement must be in a writing signed by the client, and must state how the fee is determined, the percentages for settlement, trial or appeal, the expenses deducted from the recovery, and whether those expenses come off before or after the fee is calculated. The Model Rules are a template though. Your state's own version governs, so check it.

Why does before or after matter so much?

Because the two sequences produce different amounts for you. Subtracting costs from the recovery first and then applying the percentage leaves you with more than applying the percentage first and taking costs out of the remainder. How much it matters scales with how expensive the case was to run. The rule requires the agreement to specify which applies; ask them to demonstrate it on a realistic number.

Is it rude to ask a lawyer how they fund cases?

No, and a firm that treats it as rude has answered a different question. A catastrophic case requires somebody to advance expert costs for years. A firm without the depth to do that faces structural pressure to settle early, and that pressure ends up affecting your outcome. Asking how costs are funded, and what the largest they have carried is, is a reasonable question about capacity.

What if the firm wants to refer my case to someone else?

That can be entirely proper, and sometimes it is the best thing for you. The commentary to Model Rule 1.5 notes that fee division between firms is most often used where the fee is contingent and the split is between a referring lawyer and a trial specialist, and that the client must agree to the arrangement including each lawyer's share, confirmed in writing. So you are entitled to know it is happening, who is involved, and what each is receiving.

Should I sign at the first meeting?

There is rarely a good reason to. Ask to take the agreement home, read it somewhere quiet, and compare it against the notes from the meeting. If a deadline is genuinely close a firm should explain precisely which one and why it requires signing today. Pressure without a specific deadline behind it is a reason to see someone else rather than a reason to hurry.

How many firms should I talk to?

Two or three is usually enough to calibrate, and consultations cost nothing. The limit is time: evidence perishes and filing deadlines run, so a week of comparison is sensible and a month may not be. If your injury makes long meetings genuinely difficult, prioritize: see the two firms whose answers on fees and capacity were clearest on the phone.

What is the single best question?

Probably "what are the genuine weaknesses in this case?" Every real case has some. A lawyer who names them is telling you they have assessed it rather than sold it, and it is a much better sign than uniform confidence. The runner-up is asking them to walk through the arithmetic from a realistic recovery to the figure that would actually reach you.

Can I check a lawyer's record myself?

Yes, and it is worth doing before you sign. Every state bar publishes attorney licensing status and public discipline records, usually searchable online and free. That is the one piece of due diligence entirely independent of anything you were told in the meeting, and it takes a few minutes.

What should I bring to the consultation?

Another person, your written questions, any police or incident report, the names of treating hospitals and doctors, your own insurance policies, and any correspondence you have already had from an insurer. If you have photographs of the scene or the vehicle, bring those too. You do not need to have organized everything; bring what exists.

Are these questions to ask an injury attorney different for a smaller claim?

The money questions are identical and just as worth asking. The capacity questions matter less: a claim that resolves in months does not require a firm to carry years of expert costs. If your injuries have healed and the dispute is about a defined sum, you can reasonably compress this list to the fee questions and the first ninety days.

What if I have already signed with someone I now doubt?

Clients can generally change lawyers, though the outgoing firm may claim a share of any eventual recovery for work already done, and how that is calculated varies by state. Raise your concerns with the firm directly first, in writing, because a communication problem is often fixable. If it is not, a second firm can advise on what changing would actually cost you before you do anything.

Is what I tell you private?

Yes. What you share in a case review is kept private and is used only to match you with an attorney who fits your situation. One distinction is worth understanding: true legal confidentiality, called attorney-client privilege, only attaches once you actually have an attorney-client relationship with a lawyer. Submitting a form to a referral service is not the same thing. If that matters to you, raise it directly with the attorney.

What does it cost to use MVA Lawyer Network?

Nothing. We are a free, independent referral service, not a law firm, and we do not give legal advice. Requesting a case review costs you nothing and puts you under no obligation. When a situation fits, we connect you with an independent attorney who reviews it directly, and we may be paid a referral fee by that attorney. That fee does not add anything on top of their contingency percentage. You can read more about how we operate.

Take the questions with you. Take the agreement home.

One short, private form. No cost, no obligation, and no fee unless there is a recovery.

Private · Independent · Reviewed by our team